MindScience Academy Logo

Scientific Buddhism in the XIX century

From the XIX century on, Buddhism has been called to confront challenges and opportunities collateral to the religious and cultural structure that characterized it in the pre-modern period.

by Carlo Carnevale
From the XIX century on, Buddhism has been called to confront challenges and opportunities collateral to the religious and cultural structure that characterized it in the pre-modern period.
Vengono introdotti modelli di pensiero scientifici e razionalisti, nozioni moderne di democrazia liberale e socialismo, e nuovi modelli di organizzazione economica capitalistica entrano a far parte della vita e del pensiero di buddhisti e non-buddhisti in tutta l’Asia.

During the XIX century Christian missionaries imposed their presence in Asia, assuming the primacy of Christianity grounding on the technical-scientific progress of its civilization, in the heat of colonial expansion. Yet, Buddhist intellectuals in the West and reformers in Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), Vietnam and Japan, brought these foreign narratives to a short circuit, showing from different angles how Buddhism can qualify as the only world religion that is genuinely compatible with modern science.

The weight of rituals, devotions and beliefs that Europeans would've deemed superstition is recalibrated; focusing instead in the lack of central creating deities; affirming that Buddhism is grounded upon rational intuition and empirical experience, rather than faith; insisting on the human, non-divine nature of the Buddha.
Such formula minimizes the ritual and metaphysical elements within traditional Buddhism, emphasizing scientific rationality along with first-person meditative experience, making itself compatible with the West's positivist worldview.

This wave of reinterpretation referred to by historians as Buddhist modernism (in the Western context, also known as Scientific Buddhism or Naturalized Buddhism) plays a fundamental role in the reception of Buddhism in the West since the 19th century. It exemplifies a form of Buddhism that engages with, and sometimes incorporates, certain typically modern narratives – namely, narratives that emphasize the centrality of individual reason, the scientific method, the unavoidable march to progress, suspicion of tradition and traditional authority, and the reformist impulses of Enlightenment and Protestantism.

Sources & Further Readings:
D. L. MacMahan, 2004, “Modernity and the Early Discourse of Scientific Buddhism”.
B. Victorya, 2013, D. T. Suzuki Zen and the Nazis, The Asia-Pacific Journal.

Focus on in recent months

November 2023
His Holiness Tenzin Gyatso’s deep fascination with Western natural sciences needs no introduction. MSA itself stems from his encouragement to take that path, that "gentle bridge" which was launched in the 1970s by the dialogue between Francisco Varela and His Holiness and then blossomed in the activities of Mind & Life. 
Focus on November 2023
His Holiness Tenzin Gyatso’s deep fascination with Western natural sciences needs no introduction. MSA itself stems from his encouragement to take that path, that "gentle bridge" which was launched in the 1970s by the dialogue between Francisco Varela and His Holiness and then blossomed in the activities of Mind & Life. 

More in Focus on

Amy Cohen Varela is Chair of the Board of Directors of Mind & Life Europe and has been involved in Mind and Life since its inception.
Serme Khen Rinpoche Gesce Tashi Tsering (born 1958) is the abbot of Sera Mey Monastic University in India. From 1994 to 2018 he was a resident Tibetan Buddhist teacher at the Jamyang Buddhist Centre, London.
Dr. Davidson is professor of psychology and psychiatry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison as well as founder and director of the Center for Healthy Minds. He's influential for the bearings of his research on emotion and the human brain.
Angelo Gemignami is a physician, psychiatrist and psychologist, currently teaching neuroscience at Pisa University, director of the surgical pathology and molecular medicine department; director of the neuroscience, mindfulness and contemplative practice master course and of the clinical psychology branch in the pisa university hospital ward.
Now that the Buddhist traditions confront themselves with cognitive neuroscience and other natural sciences, trying to build up or expand an edifice for studying the mind and conscious experience, it seems vital to stand for the legitimacy and self-sufficiency of Buddhist traditional thought, maintaining critical distance from the prestige (and thus privilege) the scientific apparatus holds in modern western society.
From the XIX century on, Buddhism has been called to confront challenges and opportunities collateral to the religious and cultural structure that characterized it in the pre-modern period.